|
|

| 28th June 2008 |
Dr. K.S. Jawahar Reddy, I.A.S.
The Vice –Chairman
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority
Hyderabad |
| Sir, |
| Sub: Illegal encroachment by BPPA in Hussain Sagar Lake. |
With reference to the above subject we would like to express our extreme unhappiness about the encroachment by BPPA into Hussain Sagar lake opposite to Prasad’s IMAX and adjacent to Khairatabad Fly-over. We have come to know that leaving some area for a pool like structure the other part of lake bed of Hussain Sagar in the mentioned area is proposed to be developed into a park and recreation centre. This is in complete violation of various laws and legal notifications like WALTA, EP Act 1986, Master Plan of Hyderabad and HUDA notification of 4-5-2000 declaring 169 water bodies in and around Hyderabad as protected water bodies.
The area in question is part of Hussain Sagar Lake and cannot be filled up, completely or partially. It is not a separate pond removed from the original lake bed. Dredging or desilting cannot be used as a pretext to reclaim land by dumping silt from dredging into parts of lake elsewhere which is what seems to be happening right now. It has been reiterated that no extra land can be reclaimed from any portion of this lake as has been reiterated by A.P. High Court in Sri.P.V.Narasimha Rao Creation ground case.
The unfortunate part is that, institutions legally mandated to protect the lake like HUDA and BPPA which, you head are the ones responsible for this situation. There have been many instances of violations of laws and court orders intended for protection of this lake which needs to be protected at all costs considering the historical, ecological and heritage values of this grand water body.
The original Water Spread area of the lake, with catchment of about 300 Sq. km, was around1600 Hectares but it has shrunk considerably due to numerous encroachments both by private entities as well as public agencies. The most harmful encroachments have been by State agencies like HUDA and BPPA apart from tourism department and Municipal authorities. Most of them have been done in violation/subversion of court orders.
We quote two of the most important judgments by A.P. High Court regarding Hussain Sagar:
The A.P High Court in its Order dated 15-6-2001, in W.P. No. 26378 of 2000, concluded that “No further permanent structures, including those involving commercial activities, may be allowed to be raised on or near the Water Spread or Catchment area”
W. P. No. 13656 of 2003, judgment delivered on 16.10.2003: the operative part of the judgment is “the respondents are directed to take all possible measures to protect the water spread area of Hussain Sagar Lake both from private persons and the governmental authorities as required under law”.
It is very clear that the Honorable A.P. High Court ordered the conservation and protection of remaining water spread of the lake. The three member Supreme Court Committee also clearly recommended that the area in question be maintained as part of lake.
The present activity of developing a park will lead to further decrease in the water spread area and will contribute to the increased pollution of the lake which will be caused by increase in traffic and commercial activities.
We request you to immediately halt all activities and restore the lake spread area and initiate proceedings against errant officials who are responsible for this and hope that you will respond positively and quickly and ensure that the Rule of Law is protected and strengthened.
Cordially,
|
(Dr.Jasveen Jairath)
Convener – Subcommittee on Water Bodies |
Cc to:
1) Chief Secretary, Govt. of A.P.
2) Principal Secretary, MA&UD, Govt. of A.P. |
| Date: 2.6.2008 |
The Vice Chairman
HUDA,
HYDERABADTo |
| Sir, |
| Sub: Bam ki Bowdi located at Hasan Nagar. |
Following a report appearing in the Hindu dated 14.4.2008, "Realtors eye royal spring" near Mir Alam Tank (paper cutting enclosed), Forum For A Better Hyderabad sent a team to the site and find out the facts. A route map to reach the site and photographs of Bam Ki Bowdi and a pond next to it. are attached.
Bam Ki Bowdi is a small natural pond or well located next to a natural spring which flows with water always. Bam Ki Bowdi is located in Hasan Nagar, beside H.P.Petrol Pump & Jai Bhavani Roads & Transport, No: 4-33/4/B Hasan Nagar Mandal: Rajendar Nagar. Dist: Ranga Reddy. It is about 1 k.m. from National Police Academy and about ½ k.m. from Mir Alam Tank. “Bam Ruknud Dowlah” is the original name to the pond/ well and in colloquial Language it is called “Bam Ki Bowdi”. The pond/ well has never gone dry for the last 12 years.
Beside this Bowdi there is “Janatha Swimming Pool” and HUDA Nursery.
By way of threats to Bam ki Bowdi, we observe:
• Boulders are being put into the well/pond ( please see photograph), and in course of time may fill up the pond/well.
• Constructions are coming up along the catchment area of the well/ pond - please see photographs - and these will prevent flow of water into the pond.
• These may indicate surreptitious effort for reclamation of the pond/well and the pond / well may disappear, unless the above actions are stopped forthwith.
We recommend as follows:
• Government land around the well/ pond should be clearly earmarked and protected.
• Even private land owners around the well/pond should be made to comply with the water laws and not allowed to change the land use or do any thing that may affect the pond/well.
• Encroachment on the catchment area should be removed immediately and no fresh encroachment allowed, irrespective of land ownership.
• The Well/pond should be recognized as a natural heritage. It must be protected as such with immediate effect. In due course, it should be notified as natural heritage by the Heritage Conservation Committee.
We request immediate action to save the water body
|
Yours faithfully,
(M.MANDAL)
Member, Heritage Cell |
C.C: 1. The Collector, R.R.Dist., Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner & Special Officer, GHMC, Hyderabad
3. The Chairman, Heritage Conservation Committee, HUDA, Hyderabad |
| Water Bodies beside Bam ki Bowdi |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Date: July 23 rd , 2007 |
PRESS NOTE |
On behalf of various civil society organisations from Hyderabad and coordinated by Forum For Better Hyderabad a press conference was held with reference to the recent Draft Notification for G.O.111, issued by Govt. of A.P at 11am at press club Basheerbagh. The press meet was presided over by Sri.M.Vedakumar, President, Forum For A Better Hyderabad and he emphasized on the following demands, comments and suggestions to be considered for G.O.111.
1.Technical committee constituted by the Govt. to formulate the Notification.
a).Its composition should be made public as well its mandate.
b). Report of the committee should be made public.
c).Independent representation from CSO's such as the present group should be included in the Tech. committee secondly, this representation should be nominated by the present group and not hand picked by govt.
2.EPTRI Report: cited by the Notification should be made public.
3.Notification to G.O.111 should be withdrawn and cancelled unconditionally and G.O.111 should be upheld as such – with clear ban on any construction activity within 10 kms. Radius from FTL.
4.Integrated approach to management and conservation of these two lakes (as also others) should be adopted that considers catchment water body, command and other surrounding. Environment as an organic eco- system where any interference in one sub-space will upset the natural balance in the entire unit. Hohistin versus fragmentation perspective necessary due to:
a. These lakes are part of an organizing river and downstream developments will feed into & damage river Musi.
b.Flood control an essential purpose of creating these water bodies nearly 80yrs ago – will be throttled with crowding of downstream areas such as the old city.
c.Air pollution due to industries and residential areas impurity of the lakes will cause acidification of water body and consequent damage to a drinking water body.
5.The group would like to know what were the urgent and immediate compulsions/provocations for issuing the draft notification that relakes the restrictions civil construction by “freeing” downstream areas for by private agencies designed to increase concentration of wealth and inequity.
6.These two water bodies are closer to the city and provide a cheap and clean source of drinking water compared to technically complex and economically expensive distant sources from Krishna and godavari. Their destruction should be stopped and rational water planning to be undertaken.
7.Impact of downstream developments should include both direct and indirect consequences
8.Past experience with G.O.50 for regulating private real estate developments does not inspire confidence in capacity and intent of the govt. to enforce compliance with provisions of G.O's by penalizing those who violate. What is the basis of trust in the intent of govt. in case of the Notification to G.O.111/ that regates/over rules the positive, protective & safe guarding provisions of G.O.111.
9. There are strong reasons to believe that the Notification has been designed under pressure from real estate lobby that has assume considerable elute based on real estate boom of the last decade. Their political influence on such decisions stands exposed and corroborated beyond doubt by the statements of jubilation posted on the website of group of real estate developers. This group believes that contractors and real estate lobby will stand to gain astronomical amount if this Notification is issued at heavy cost to wider society. It is thus an undemonstrative and anti-social act.
10. Global perspective on water bodies advocates integrated conceptualization of water bodies and their surroundings. The Notification goes in direct opposition to what is agreed world wide & thus carries no weight.
11. There is no relation of the Notification with Master Plan. Rather than the Master Plan influencing developments according to a long term strategy – it is itself being propelled through co-opting the ad-hoc and random land use sanations real estate lobby. The group strongly advocates that all such notifications need to be considered in content of the objectives and goals of the agreed Master Plan –when it is finalized.
12. Major decisions should emerge after consultation with people's elected representatives – councilors, Mayor, RWA coordinators etc- as they are these major stakeholders. In the absence of such governance mechanism – all such decisions should be put on hold.
The Members from Forum For A Better Hyderabad and Civil Society groups have expensive their resentment and concerned on G.O.111 and instated the Govt. to act upon the above suggestions. The press meet came to an end with concluding remarks by Smt.Jasveen Jairath.
The Members of Forum and from civil society groups who attended the press meet and expressed their views on G.O.111 as follow;
Sri. Naram Krishna Rao.
Dr.M.S.Kodarkar.
Sri.Borugula Narsing rao.
Sri. Keshav rao jadav.
Dr..O.M.Debara
Smt.Jasveen jairat.
Smt.Sangamitramallik
Sri.R.K.Singh.
Sri.Umesh varma.
Smt.Saraswathi rao
Sri.Ashwaq.
Sri.B.V.S.Rao
Smt.K.Supriya.
Sri.S.Kiran.
Sri.D.N.Reddy.
Dr.C.Ramachandraiah.
Sri. Kulsum reddy.
|
 |
From left to Right: Sri. Naram Krishna Rao, Sri.M.Vedakumar, Sri. Keshav rao jadav, Dr.M.S.Kodarkar.and Sri.Jeevan Kumar |
|
| 22nd July 2007 |
To,
Dr. Sri.Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy
The Hon’ble Chief Minister
Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad |
| Sub: - Proposed Draft Notification-Regulations for development-G.O.Ms.No.111,Ref: Memo.No.261/I1/2006 dated 16-07-2007 issued by MA&UD Department, GOAP. |
Respected Sir,
As concerned citizens of city of Hyderabad we would like to share our misgivings, anxieties and concerns regarding the above Draft Notification.
To begin with - we wish to bring to your notice that a water body is influenced not only by activities in catchment areas and the lake itself but also in command area. That is why a holistic approach becomes very important particularly in case of lakes acting as drinking water sources - as in the case of Osmansagar and Himayatsagar – the two lakes in question. This is in conformity with professional understanding of lakes at the global level as reflected by two major documents World Lake Vision (WLV) – A Call to Action and (2) Integrated Lake Basin Management (ILBM – A report for Lake Basin Managers and Stakeholders- published by International Lake Environment Committee Foundation (ILEC), Japan, that have deeply influenced actions for conservation and management of lakes and reservoirs across the globe.
GO 111 is a comprehensive order that is in tune with International thinking, policymaking and administrative practices. It was a better instrument created taking in to consideration (a) water shed of Hyderabad region and (b) integrated approach for long-term sustainability of these lakes.
It is rather shocking to see proposed modifications with reference to down stream areas of these reservoirs. Proposed amendments go contrary to an ‘Integrated approach’ and Lake environment is being analyzed in fragmented way as up-stream, and down stream which is against global thinking, experience and practices. The amendment seems to be an exercise Government is forced to undertake under the pressure of vested interests. Implementation of these amendments will open floodgates to destructive developments and degradation and final destruction of these reservoirs that will go Hussainsagar way.
Specifically, we are opposed to the Draft Notification for following reasons:
First, all members of the committee that recommended the amendments were from Governmental organizations, without any representation to Civil Society and independent Academic institutions. It appears to be ‘For, Of and By’ the Government. This is unacceptable to us.
Make all relevant documents public and give sufficient time before the process is restarted
There was no public hearing or elicitation of opinion of civil society.
The areas proposed to be earmarked as per amendments for down stream construction activity – euphemistically referred to as “development” - have no scientific basis and arbitrary.
We demand comprehensive rethinking on the issue and with drawl of proposed amendments. It needs a statesman to steer destiny of a nation and we appeal to you (CM) to stop this whole negative process of private appropriation of natural resources for personal gain of few at the cost of stifling the historic lifeline of Hyderabad city.
We look forward to a citizen sensitive governance from you and hope that our views as above will receive due consideration as the matter is a serious public issue with grave implications for future generations.
Please find enclosed the following enclosures - Annexure – 1 (Detailed version of Suggestions/Objections), - Annexure – 2 (Letter of Sri.Capt.J.Rama Rao to Principal Secretary, MA&UD, dt: - 21st July, 2007) |
Respectfully yours
FORUM FOR A BETTER HYDERABAD
&
CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS |
 |
| 22nd June 2007 |
To,
The District Collector
Rangareddy District
Hyderabad |
| Dear Sir, |
| Sub: - Illegal Encroachment of lakes in Rangareddy District |
After a series of articles appeared in various newspapers about various lakes being encroached the sub-committee on Water Bodies of Forum for a Better Hyderabad decided to investigate and verify facts. A visit was organized to some of the lakes on 16-06-2007.
The following lakes were visited and the observations follow: -
1)Durgam Cheruvu, Lingampally Mandal: The lake has a long history being choked by various encroachments. Recently HUDA has taken up construction of a STP(Sewerage Treatment Plant) of 10 MLD capacity. The construction was taken up within the lakebed further reducing the spread of the lake. We have observed that the lake is freshly being encroached by unidentified people adjacent to the STP by filling up the lake with huge boulders and soil. This we believe is being done for construction of buildings. |
 |
 |
| |
2) Medikunta Cheruvu, Lingampally Mandal: This is a small lake in Nanakram Guda opposite to Wipro Office. The lake is being encroached towards the roadside by filling it up with debris and stones. A small phone booth structure has already come up on the encroached land. If this is not checked the lake will disappear within no time. |
 |
 |
| |
2) Gangaram Pedda Cheruvu/Chandanagar Pedda Cheruvu Serilingampally Municipality:This lake is very big one and is one among the 169 lakes notified by HUDA for conservation. A huge layout is coming up on the boundary of this lake. A very high ranking official in the central government is allegedly trying to occupy the lake by filling up some portions of it. The local revenue authorities have actually come to the place a few days ago and took notes of the encroachments but apparently the authorities have not initiated any action against the violators. This lake faces another major problem, which is the entry of huge quantities of untreated sewage from surrounding lakes due to which the lake is subject to eutrophication and will lead to groundwater pollution. |
| |
4) Nallagandla Cheruvu, Lingampally Mandal: This Lake is being encroached by a private construction company by filling up with morrum soil in huge quantity and fencing up the area. The total extent of land looks quite substantial and according to a newspaper report it is around 19 acres. The revenue authorities here also have visited the place and they have asked the company in question to stop all activity. They have not taken any measures to clear the encroachment so far. |
 |
| |
5) Ambeer Cheruvu, Dundigul Mandal: This Lake is being encroached by a private developer to build high rise apartments. The lake has well marked Full Tank Level (FTL) in spite of which the violation is being done. The lake is being filled up with stone boulders obtained by blasting sheet rock adjacent to the lake boundary. A road has already come up in the middle of the lake to provide access to people, which, is now being used to encroach the lake. |
 |
 |
 |
| |
6) Gowlidoddi Cheruvu Lingampalli Mandal:This lake present in very serene surroundings is slowly being encroached by increasing real estate activity and runs a risk of being obliterated soon by them. Many plotting and wall construction activities have already encroached into the lakebed and the authorities have not taken any steps to reclaim the public land. The FTL has not been marked which is leading to further encroachments.
|
 |
|
|
 |
Sir, we request you as the top man of the district administration responsible for protection of these lakes, to take immediate action and prosecute the violators who are brazenly resorting to destruction of precious community resources. Hyderabad and surroundings which have a normally low ground water table owe this precious little quantity to the presence of these lakes which do a yeomen service to the common man by recharging ground water table and the improve the environmental quality of the surroundings. HUDA had issued a notification declaring 169 lakes in and around Hyderabad as water bodies slated for conservation and declared all construction activities illegal within a distance of 30 meters on all sides from FTL. We are noticing that leave alone the 30 meters buffer, even lake bed within FTL is being encroached.
Please initiate steps immediately to remove these encroachments, remove the material inside the lakes, punish the culprits and mark the FTL boundary of the lakes by permanent measures. |
Thanking you,
Cordially,
Umesh Varma |
| Top |
| June 8, 2007 |
| To |
Shri.J.Harinarayan, IAS
Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh,
AP Government Secretariat,
Hyderabad – 500 022 |
| Dear Shri .J.Harinarayan, |
7th Anniversary of the Forum For a Better Hyderabad and the
Observance of the World Environment day on 5.6.07
Sub: G.O. 111- A Bad Order, Not Practicable, Not the Solution? |
We thank you for gracing our above meeting with your presence as the chief guest on the occasion of Forum For A Better Hyderabad’s 7th Anniversary and World Environment Day on 5th June 2007. Your appreciation for Forum’s activities and its involvement to protect environment is highly regarded. We are pleased to hear that, the Government looks forward to involve the Forum and NGOs.
In this connection, we refer to the parts of your speech:
The G.O.111 is reported to have been termed as a bad order and not practicable and it is not the solution for protection of Osman Sagar and Himayat Sagar lakes.
We would like to bring it at your kind notice few points about G.O.111:
The State Government after careful examination of the recommendations of the Expert Committee, prepared after detailed discussions and field visits, decided to reaffirm the 10 Km prohibition by issuing G.O.Ms.No.111.M.A. dated 8 th March 1996, in modification of the earlier orders issued in G.O.Ms.No. 192 MA dated 31-3-1994. The salient features in respect of catchment area are:
To prohibit polluting Industries, Major Hotels, Residential Colonies or other establishments that generate pollution, in the catchment of the lakes up to 10 Kmsfrom Full Tank Level (FTL)of the lakes. The land use of about 90 % of the area upto10 Kms in the catchment is to be classified as recreational and conservation use which is inclusive of horticulture and floriculture
One fails to see the impracticability for implementing the above, on which the State Administration has failed to act during the last 11 years, leading to present situation.
Supreme Court Order
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its Order dated 1-12-2000, ruled that the government could not grant exemptions to the provisions of G.O.111 unmindful of the fate of lakhs of citizens of twin cities, to whom drinking water is supplied from these lakes. Such exemptions carelessly passed ignoring the “Precautionary Principle” could be catastrophic.
PIL in AP High Court
The A.P State Government represented by its Chief Secretary is Respondent No.1, in W.P 9386 / 2007 filed in Hon’ble AP High Court, regarding violations of the provisions of G.O.111. The additional information as directed by Hon’ble High Court, has since been submitted and W.P is likely to come up for hearing shortly.
At this stage the remarks of the Chief Secretary, by terming G.O.111 as a bad order, impracticable, not a solution for protection of the drinking water sources etc, are unwarranted and send a wrong message to the public, that too on “World Environment Day”. This may amount to interference with adjudication.
If what the Chief Secretary is reported to have stated is correct and reflects the views of the State Government, it is hoped that the same will be submitted before the Hon’ble AP High Court for appropriate adjudication of the case.
|
Thanking You,
Yours sincerely,
(M.VEDAKUMAR)
President, Forum For A Better Hyderabad |
| Top |
| TO |
|
Date:11.5.2007 |
Sri.L.Premchandra Reddy, IAS.,
The District Collector.
Ranga Reddy District |
| Dear Sir, |
Sub: - Illegal Constructions and Encroachments in Musi River and Catchments
Area. Findings by a Fact Finding Team. Immediate Remedial Action needed.
|
Having come across reports in various newspapers and also from other sources of Illegal Constructions and Encroachments in Musi River and Catchments Area, the Forum for A Better Hyderabad sent a Fact Finding Team (FFT) to find out the actual situation. The FFT consisted of representatives of few other organizations/Individuals. The following are the members of the FFT.
1) Sri.M.Vedakumar Forum For A Better Hyderabad
2) Sri.OM Debara -do-
3) Smt.Jasveen Jairath -do-
4) Sri.Umesh Varma -do-
5) Prof.K.Muthyam Reddy Professor, Osmania University
6) Sri.K.Narasimha Reddy Bhongir Ex-MLA
7) Sister Selvin from CHATRI
8) Sri.Adarsh Srivastav Musi life group
9) Sri.P.Mahesh Musi life group
10) Ms.Kalyani.G Architect
11) Ms.Arshea Sultana Planner
12) Sri.G.Venkateshwar Rao Planner
Areas visited:
1) ORR Construction across Musi near Narsingi Cross Roads
2) Causeway near Gandipet Village across Musi
3) Site near Surplus Weir of Osman Sagar
4) Balkapur Nala near Manikonda Village
Our findings and recommendations are given in the following paragraphs.
1) CAUSEWAY NEAR GANDIPET VILLAGE ACROSS MUSI
An illegal causeway has been built in the river bed of Musi River. The news was published in Eenadu Newspaper Hyderabad Edition on 31st March 2007. (Page No.7 Newspaper clipping of Eaanadu) We verified the fact of the existence of illegal causeway. To the best of our knowledge and belief this was taken up without the permission of any authority. The Causeway encroaches into the riverbed and can cause obstruction and thus flooding in Gandipet Village. Photograph No.1 on Page 1 is enclosed for your reference.
RECOMMENDATION:The illegal cause way has to be immediately destroyed without any delay and the permissions given, if any, for development to the owners of land responsible for building it should be immediately cancelled. The area in question has to be kept free from any construction activity, so close to the riverbed so that the sanctity of Bio Conservation Zone (BCZ) is maintained.
2) A ROAD ON GOVT. PROPERTY FROM THE CAUSEWAY FOR AN APPROACH TO THE LAND OF THE ENCROACHERS.
The above encroachers (Srinivas Reddy) have also built a road on govt. property from the causeway for an approach way to their lands apparently without any PERMISSION. Photograph No.1 on Page 2 in support of our statement is enclosed.
3) DEVELOPMENT OF LAND ADJACENT TO THE RIVER BED ABUTTING THE CAUSEWAY.
Reportedly one Mr. Agarwal, another site owner is developing land adjacent to the riverbed. This plot development has encroached into the riverbed and the developer is dumping huge amounts of Earth and Rocks into the riverbed and has plans to encroach the river. He has already built boundary wall in the riverbed against all rules. Photograph No.2 on Page 1 and Photo No.2 on Page 2 corroborating our statement is enclosed.
RECOMMENDATION:The development activity being taken up by Mr. Agarwal also has to be stopped immediately and he has to be prosecuted and penalized heavily apart from bearing the expenses for clearing the debris he has dumped into the river.
4) LEVELLING OF SITE AND PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION IN APPROXIMATELY 22 ACRES RIGHT NEXT TO SURPLUS WEIR OF OSMANSAGAR IN THE DOWNSTREAM.
This site is right next to the surplus weir of Osman Sagar in the downstream and is spread approximately over 22 acres. The plot allegedly belongs to one Mr.K.Lakshma Reddy. The plot is very close to the discharge of the reservoir and the team is not sure about the Legal status of the claim. It is the same with above-mentioned two properties also. The Forum has to verify the claims by using RTI Act. The site is being leveled and the workers at the site said they will be taking up construction shortly but they are not aware of the nature/type of construction to be taken up
The site by the proximity to the reservoir might be classified as a high-risk one and any construction work that might progress here has the potential to damage the structure of the dam, which will have disastrous consequences. There are also many rock formations in the site that are to be leveled and we fear that High-grade explosives will be used to clear them which will be damaging the dam. The photograph No. 3 of Page No.1 in support of our statement is enclosed for reference.
RECOMMENDATION: The permissions, if any, given to Mr.Lakshma Reddy have to be reviewed and if they involve violating the provisions of BCZ, have to be cancelled immediately and the land has to be kept free from construction activity according to the provisions of BCZ as per the Honorable Supreme Court’s Order
5) ENCROACHMENT OF BALKAPUR NALA.
The Nala is one of the most important feeder nalas of Hussain Sagar. The team observed that all along the length the Nala it has been subject to encroachments and obstructions illegally. Within a length of 1-1.2 km the Nala has been filled up partially or completely by a DWACRA Bhavan and 3 approach roads completely and in many more places by dumping of earth and rocks from the adjacent plots which are being leveled recently for further development. Further APIIC is developing an IT Park and has dumped its waste into the Nala disfiguring it beyond recognition. We fear that unless the administration reins in its own department and the other private real estate developers the Nala is going to disappear and the place will be prone to frequent flooding during monsoons for lack of drainage facilities presently being offered by the Nala. The blocking of this Nala will also result in decreased inflows into Hussain Sagar Lake and consequently will result in the slow death of the magnificent water body in the heart of the city. Photographs No.1,2 and 3 in Page 4 and Photo No.1 in Page 5 are enclosed in support of our statement.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Balkapur Nala has to be immediately cleared of all Encroachments and obstructions and persons responsible, including APIIC have to be prosecuted and action be taken, The boundaries of the Nala have to be marked clearly by the joint survey of Revenue and Irrigation departments and the Nala has to be repaired and the silt and debris should be removed completely to revive it along with plantations all along the boundary to conserve it.
6) MASSIVE LAND FILLING TAKEN UP ON THE MUSI RIVERBED AT ATTAPUR BRIDGE
A month before the rainy season commences, the Musi river bed at Attapur Bridge is in for a massive land filling. Debris and loose earth including huge boulders are being dumped in the river bed here. It is being done on both sides of the bridge and the width of the river has come down alarmingly. This we believe is being done to exploit the real estate boom in the present days. This will cause immeasurable damage to the environs and has the potential to create tremendous loss to human lives and property in the event of the river flooding. A corroborative report from The Hindu Dt: - 30.4.2007 is enclosed at Page No.6. A representative from FBH had visited the site.
RECOMMENDATIONS:The encroachments have to be stopped immediately and steps taken to prevent recurrence. The debris in the river has to be cleared immediately before the monsoon season and after a thorough enquiry the Culprits should be brought to book as per law.
We further bring to your notice the following developments:
Outer Ring Road (ORR) Construction across Musi near Narsingi Cross Roads:
The work seems to be progressing leisurely on a bridge construction of 45 m width for ORR across Musi River. The water in the riverbed is being obstructed in a large area due to which the water is stagnating and has formed a huge cesspool. The stagnating water has become a huge mosquito-breeding center and has the potential to cause a huge problem to the health of local residents of Gandipet and Narsingi villages. They either are waiting for the monsoon season to arrive and go or are they are not planning the project well. If there are heavy rains and the gates of Osman Sagar are lifted, the foundation work might be washed off and cause a huge loss. On the other hand, it might also obstruct the free flow of excess waters and cause damage to the surrounding villages. Photographs No.1,2,3 in Page No.3 are enclosed for your reference.
Recommendation: The ORR authorities should be prevailed upon to take immediate steps to ensure that free flow of water is not obstructed
|
|
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
(M.VEDAKUMAR)
President
Forum For A Better Hyderabad
Mobile: 9848044713
E-mail: chelimi@yahoo.com |
C.C to: 1. Sri.K.Jawahar Reddy, IAS., Managing Director, HMWSSB, Hyd.
2. Sri. S.P.Tucker, IAS., Principal Secretary, Irrigation, Hyd.
3. Sri.C.V.S.K.Sharma, Chief Commissioner, GHMC, Hyd
4. Sri.Jayesh Ranjan, IAS.,Vice Chairman, HUDA, Hyd.
5. Sri.S.P.Singh, IAS., Principal Secretary, MAUD, Hyd.
6. The Director, DTCP, Hyd.
7. The Managing Director, APIIC
8. Sri.Rajeshwar Tiwari, IAS., Member Secretary, APPCB, Hyd.
9. The MRO, Rajendranagar Mandal
10. The MRO, Sheikpet Mandal. |
 |
| A Causeway across River Musi |
|
 |
| Musi river is being filled by mud and sotnes near Osmansagar |
|
|
 |
| View of Old and New cause way bridges of River Musi |
|
 |
| Musi river is being filled by sotnes |
|
 |
| Musi river is being filled by sotnes |
|
 |
| Cunstruction of Outer Ring Road |
|
 |
| Cunstruction behind Musi River near Outer Ring Road |
|
|
 |
| Stones laid across the Nala |
|
 |
| Balkpur Nala filled with stones |
|
|
 |
| The historical Balakpur Channel in the vicinity of Manikonda Village has been filled up to |
|
 |
| Balakpur Cheruvu |
Cheruvu
|
| TOP |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| Top |
| Forum / 2006 |
July 31, 2006 |
|
The Vice Chairman & Managing Director,
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority,
Paigah Palace , Rasoolpura, Hyderabad – 500 003
Sir,
Sub: Protection of Catchment Area of Himayatsagar & Osmansagar Reservoirs
The important aspects of catchment area land use, stipulated in G.O.Ms.No. No. 111 M.A dated 8-3-19996 , for protection of Himayatsagar and Osmansagar Reservoirs , are listed below for your ready reference
The land use of about 90 % of the area is classified as recreational andconservation use in the Master Plan. The HUDA should take action for classification of this 90% of the area as Agriculture , which is inclusive of horticulture and floriculture – Para 3 (b)
To restrict the FSI to 1: 0.5 in the catchment area . This measure will ensure
that that 90 % of the area remains under agriculture, as is the practice now
and ensure protection of the lakes- Para 3 (c)
But from the information provided by MPDO, Moinabad Mandal, R.R District, vide letter dated 6-3-2006 copy of which is enclosed for ready reference, it is observed that a number of Layouts and Resorts, without obtaining permission or with the permission of Ex / Present Sarpanch, are being developed in the catchment area within 10 KMs of FTL. It is a also a well known fact that a number of educational institutions, and unauthorized developments are coming up within the prohibited catchment area
It will be appreciated if HUDA can confirm that 90% of the area as stipulated, has been classified as Agriculture and notified accordingly. Would also appreciate the information about action being taken to remove / prevent the developments in the catchment area, in violation of the provisions of G.O. No 111
Looking forward for an early response
Your Cordially
Capt.J.Rama Rao I.N. (Retd)
Chairman
Copy to 1) Principal Secretary
Dept of MA&UD
2) The Collector , R.R District |
| Top |

FORUM FOR A BETTER HYDERABAD Celebrated World Water Day on 22nd
March 2004 on the banks of Hussainsagar [Necklace Road] to fit
into the theme “Quality
of Potable Water in Twin Cities”
by taking the message “the need to
conserve, preserve and protect drinking water” across to school
children from different schools in twin cities. The function was
attended by several NGOs like SAMATA, Programme for
Environmental Awareness in Schools (PEAS).
The Union and the State governments
had not taken adequate steps to monitor the quality of drinking
water, which had an important bearing on the health of people.
Due to water scarcity people were consuming water from whatever
source was available to them, in this process exposing
themselves to health hazards. Nearly 90% of water supply in the
country was found to be polluted and consequently 15 lakh
children under five die annually due to water-borne diseases, as
per the Central Pollution Control Board. A CPCB survey
conducted on 241 towns in 14 States in 1999 found that a meager
1.6% of the polluted waste water gets treated. The problem of
health hazards increase multi-fold with bulging urban areas [in
1901 less than 10% of the state population were living in urban
areas and now around 30% of state’s population living in urban
areas]. During January-November 2003, 45 people died and
several thousands were admitted due to diseases caused by
polluted water and poor sanitary conditions in Fever Hospital
alone. The numbers admitted and died in 2003 are more than
double than those in 2002. Several died in Niloufer Hospital.
The groundwater is one of the major
sources for drinking in twin cities. The groundwater table,
which said to have fallen by nearly 100 to 200 feet, was also
found to have ‘harmful’ concentration of nitrate and fluoride.
Presence of nitrates above 40 ppm is considered harmful. The
observations indicated nitrate levels of the order of 250 ppm.
About Function
Mr. M. Veda Kumar Forum President welcomed the gathering and
introduced the functioning of Forum, saying that it has ten
working groups, namely (1) Urban development, slums and other
related matters, (2) Heritage, culture, etc. (3) Rock Formation
& Ecology, (4, 9 & 10) Urban Parks, Forests, Birds & Wildlife,
[5) Urban Lakes & Water bodies, [6 & 7] Urban Transport, noise
pollution, Auto Pollution, Industrial pollution, etc. and (8)
Solid Waste Management. Capt. J. Rama Rao, Forum Chairman in his
message specifically addressing the children informed while
India accounted for 17 per cent of the world population, it had
only four percent of world’s water. The Forum, which tested
three water bodies in the twin cities – Hussainsagar, Osmansagar
and Himayatsagar – for 10 parameters, released its findings. R.
Ravi of SAMATA while presenting the results said that pollution
levels were mounting in Hussainsagar, with the inflow of sewage
and other effluents [see the attachment -1]. The dissolved
oxygen (DO) content was much below the required level, resulting
in organic pollution, while the high phosphate content was
leading to growth of algae, odour and colour formation.
Osmansagar and Himayatsagar, main drinking water resources,
showed fluoride content above the permissible limits and algai
bloom that was hazardous to health. Groundwater samples taken
from bore-wells near these resources also showed fluoride
content beyond permissible limits. Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
prepared a handout – press note [see the attachment – 2] and
circulated to media and others on the general water quality
information over different parts of Hyderabad and VIZAG.
 |
|
 |
|
Mr. Jeevan Reddy, Mr. Vedakumar, Capt. J. Rama Rao, Mr.
Sarvotham Rao are seen with children |
|
Mr. Vedakumar is addressing the participants
From Left to Right...
Dr. Pushpa, Mr. Teru, Capt. J. Rama Rao, Mr. Jeevanand
Reddy, Ms. Sangamitra Mallik, Mr. Ravi of Samatha |
From PEAS, Mrs. Pushpa and children spoke on the occasion
highlighting the need to have safe drinking water on one side
and preserve the scarce commodity like water. School children
also presented a song programme on this and Ms. Sanghamitra
Malik presented a poem on the occasion in English and Hindi.
Sri. C. Sarvotham Rao Forum Treasurer presented vote of thanks
by thanking Buddha Poornima Authority for permitting to use the
place, schoolchildren [though they are busy with their exams
they could spare the time for the occasion], media and others
including Forum members who participated in the function.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mr. Sarvotham Rao - Treasurer is speaking
From left to Right
: Capt. J. Rama Rao - Chairman, Mr. Jeevanand Reddy -
Secretary, Mr. Veda Kumar, Chief Convenor of Forum For a
Better Hyderabad |
|
Children Participants |
At
this occasion Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy presented a letter written
to the Vice Chairman, Buddha Poornima Authority [BPA] by him on
behalf of the forum where the Forum appealed to the BPA to stop
illegal construction activity in the prohibited 30-meter buffer
zone along the Hussainsagar Lake and letting out the lake water
by lifting sluice gates near the Viceroy hotel. Though the Sate
High Court had issued a stay on the construction of Rock Garden
in the periphery of Hussainsagar following a writ petition filed
by the Forum. Even as the stay order was in operation, a
massive concrete structure with stell reinforcement in between
Rock Garden and People’s Plaza was coming up in the 30-meter
buffer zone in violation of all norma presents disregard to
water bodies & law. The Forum also expressed its concern over
the unhygienic conditions that had prevailed following large
congregation of people during the recent ‘chicken festival’ and
the Telugu Desam Party’s ‘Vijayabheri’.
It is
frightening; children and adults today carry an estimated 300 or
more chemical residues that were not present in their
grandparent’s body. These chemicals accumulate in the body with
time and are passed on to the next generation often in high
concentrations. Waterborne diseases, caused by the intake of
chemicals and contaminated water, affects around 3.4 million
people globally. In India, around 563,000 people are affected
annually, one fourth of which are children, according to the
Union ministry of health and family welfare. [Down to Earth,
June 15, 2002].
Groundwater Pollution: Few Examples:
|
Location |
Element |
Observed Values |
Desirable Limit |
Source of
Pollution |
|
Patancheru |
Arsenic |
upto 700
ppb |
10 ppb |
Industrial |
|
Hyderabad |
Nitrate |
1.2 – 760
mg/l |
45 mg/l |
Urban |
|
" |
Copper |
0.03-0.49
mg/l |
0.05 mg/l |
Industrial |
|
Osmansagar |
Sulphate |
673-1996
mg/l |
200 mg/l |
Agriculture |
|
Vizag |
Nitrate |
0.0-556
mg/l |
45 mg/l |
Urban |
|
" |
Lead |
0.18-0.19
mg/l |
0.05 mg/l |
Industrial |
|
" |
Cadmium |
0.3-0.72
mg/l |
0.01 mg/l |
Industrial |
| |
|
|
|
|
In
Patancheru industrial area,
groundwater is polluted to a great extent. The total dissolved
solids have increased. Arsenic level in certain villages is as
high as 700 parts per billion (ppb) as against the permissible
10 ppb as recommended by WHO. Similarly, water pollution is
reported in Jeedimetla and SIRIS industrial areas;
In
Visakhapatnam,
groundwater is highly polluted so much so that water has become
unfit for drinking in Mindi-Chukkavanipalem industrial zone.
Similarly the pollution is also observed in other industrial
zones also;
In
Hyderabad and Visakhapatnam urban areas,
nitrate pollution is observed due to sewerage waste and lack of
sound sanitary management system;
Due
to excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides,
excess concentration of phosphate, nitrate, potassium often
occur in above permissible limits in intensively irrigated
patches;
A
study conducted by NGRI has revealed high levels of arsenic,
lead, strontium and other heavy metals in the soil and water in
Kattedan. Soil samples taken from Kattedan revealed high
quantities of arsenic – 8 ppm to 15 ppm [permissible level – 2
ppm] --, which is an extremely poisonous chemical that can cause
cancer of the bladder, kidney, liver, skin; lead too is
alarmingly high – more than 1000 ppm [permissible level – 50
ppm] --, which can effect nervous system, kidneys, inhibits
production of hemoglobin, interferes with fetal growth, skeletal
formation and renal cancer. Water samples revealed high levels
of lead, strontium – 2000 ppb [permissible level – 100 ppb],
selenium – more than 20 ppb [permissible level – 10 ppb], which
will impede growth and cause anemia.
Top
|
Protection
of Lakes
Hyderabad's
Deccan topography facilitated construction of a number of water
storing devices (lakes, ponds, reservoirs etc.), both natural and
man-made. They provided drinking water to millions and helped recharge
groundwater. So many of them have disappeared and got seriously
contaminated, thanks to encroachments, land grabbing and discharge
of untreated industrial effluents and domestic sewage. The attitude
of the powers that be has been that of apathy, connivance and collusion.
There is a larger preference for costly water supply schemes rather
than protecting the existing water bodies. What should be done?
For more read below:
IInd order to have sufficient fresh water to sustain
life throughout the year and even in bad monsoon periods, it has
become necessary to store rainwater during monsoon months in lakes
and ponds. In our country, since the days of Harappan civilization
over 4000 years ago, the practice of building reservoirs existed
to store rainwater for drinking, irrigation and other uses. Kautalya's
Arthasastra tells us that the King was to provide assistance to
people who built tanks, and Manu imposed capital punishment on a
person who destroyed a tank bund.
But what is happening now to the lakes, tanks, ponds etc., is altogether
different. Instead of building more tanks to meet fresh water requirements
of ever-increasing population, we are not even able to protect and
preserve good old water bodies and are accelerating the process
of their destruction. This is an alarming trend, which will lead
to rapid depletion of groundwater resulting in acute fresh water
scarcity apart from disturbing the ecological balance.
Hyderabad and its surroundings get most of the rainfall during the
South-West monsoon period from June to September amounting to total
annual average rainfall of about 85 cm. In Hyderabad Metropolitan
Area (HMA), there are 169 lakes of 10 hectares and above to impound
and store rainwater during monsoon months. These are also notified
by Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA). Out of these, about
145 lakes are reported to be dry up during non-monsoon months and
they are being allowed to be systematically and gradually encroached,
filled-up and used for residential and other purposes either with
the connivance of the authorities concerned or by manipulating the
records. One fails to understand the logic of allowing the existing
tanks, ponds etc., to be destroyed and at the same time spending
huge amounts for creating rain water harvesting pits and costly
water supply schemes?
|
-
|
|
Illegal
constructions and encroachments in lakebeds
Courtesy : Eenadu
|
|
The questions to be asked are:
-
Is the Government really serious about protecting the water
bodies from land grabbers and, preserving and restoring them?
If so, why doesn't Government act swiftly and decisively?
Is A.P. Water, Land and Trees Act 2001 going to be another tool
to encourage corruption?
Why doesn't the Government concentrate on integrated development
of the water bodies and their catchment areas, in and around Hyderabad,
instead of thinking of grandiose plans for bringing water from Kistna
or Godavari at exorbitant cost?
Considerable damage has already been done to many of the lakes
in HMA and its environs, either by polluting waters due to dumping
of solid wastes, discharge domestic sewage and industrial effluents
into them or by reducing the size of the lake areas by encroachments
and other developmental activities. The dumping of garbage and the
discharge of untreated or under-treated effluents and sewage are
in violation of Section 24 of Water Act 1974, but AP Pollution Control
Board and the Government remain passive spectators to such happenings.
Measures to be undertaken:
Small capacity sewage treatment plants may be set up in different
localities to treat sewage generated and to utilise the treated
waters for non-domestic purposes in the respective localities. This
will arrest excessive exploitation of ground waters and pollution
of surface water sources. The desilting of lakebeds, strengthening
of tank bunds and construction of spillways for the discharge of
surplus waters, should be undertaken on a priority basis. This will
ensure harvesting of rain water and recharging of ground water in
the area, apart from preventing flooding of low lying areas.
A survey of all lakes in HUDA area be undertaken as per revenue
records on a top priority basis to identify "Full Reservoir Levels"
(FRL) and "Maximum Reservoir Levels" (MRL) and demarcate their boundaries.
Extensive green belts be developed in the areas between FRL and
MRL and on lake bunds around the lakes. The demarcated lake areas
should be protected from further encroachments suitable fencing
may erected around for this purpose. The patta lands, if any, within
the demarcated areas are to be acquired by paying reasonable compensation
or offering suitable incentives to genuine landowners. The change
of land use in water bodies should not to be permitted under any
circumstances, by amending Section 12 of Urban Areas Development
Act 1975. The encroachments within in the demarcated boundaries
may be removed in a phased manner based on their adverse impact
on water bodies. Otherwise, there is every danger of repeated flooding
and inundation of residential areas as experienced in August 2000.
The HUDA issued a Notification in May 2000, listing 169 lakes with
an extension of more than 10 hectares, for protection and keeping
them free of any types of constructions irrespective of ownership
of land or land use or Master/Zonal Development Plans that may have
been previously notified or sanctioned. The Notification also stipulates
that a buffer belt of 30 meters width, on all sides of each lake,
must be kept free from any type of construction in the interest
of prevention of pollution of lake waters and to allow free inflows
and outflows. Once these lakes are recognized as potential sources
of water supply, and if protected, they may prove to be more cost
effective and eco-friendly than bringing Kishna or Godavari waters
to Hyderabad.
However, because of involvement of multiple agencies like local
bodies (MCH, Municipalities and Panchayats), Revenue department,
Irrigation department, Pollution Control Board, HUDA etc., and due
to lack of inter-departmental coordination and proper appreciation,
the protection of lakes has become a serious causality all these
years. A single agency, therefore, will have to be made responsible
and accountable for all activities related to protection of lakes.
Moreover, the protection of lakes cannot be dealt with in isolation,
as it is closely interlinked with proper treatment of catchment
areas, urban forestry and green belt development, land use planning
and management etc. It will have to be integrated with biomass management
involving land, water and greenbelts. It is hoped that protection
and development of 169 notified lakes, will be integrated with the
Indo-Dutch Green Hyderabad Project 2000-04.
The HUDA, which is the implementing agency of Indo-Dutch project,
be appointed as the nodal agency responsible and accountable for
coordination of all activities connected with the maintenance, protection,
development and preservation of 169 lakes in HMA. The local Lake
Protection Cells, involving stakeholders and local communities be
constituted for each lake that will act as watchdogs and give feed
back to HUDA. The sale and registration of lands in the areas covered
under notified lakes should be banned. No development activities
should be permitted in these areas, which are to be supervised and
controlled by HUDA. It is hoped that Andhra Pradesh Water, Land
and Trees Ordinance, 2000 and the subsequent Act on the subject
will bring in more inter-departmental coordination and accountability
in protecting the lakes from the land grabbers and sharks!
|
| Top |
|
| |
|
SOILS, WATER, BIODIVERSITY AND CULTURES |
|
R. Rajamani, lAS, (Retd) |
Soils, water and biological diversity expressed in all flora and
fauna, existed long before the human species, Home erectus, who was
part of this scene came down from the trees and started behaving as
though he was superior to other species. In early history of the world
many natural disasters and phenomena occurred like floods, avalanches,
earth quakes, and continental drift and meteorite strikes. These
wrought many changes like disappearance of species, formation of new
continents and landmasses.
Geological tumults which brought a glacial
era, ecosystem changes (like the rise of the Himalayas), formation of
fossil fuels and so on. The human species evolved long after many of
these changes had occurred and we are witnesses even today to many
natural disasters, though not on the same scale so far. Human beings
have made their contribution to the destruction of resources by events
such as the World Wars and indiscriminate industrialization which have
left deep scars on our soils, water and biodiversity, not to speak of
air which is a big subject in itself! It is important to note that
these changes due to anthropogenic forces are compressed in time scale
and accelerate environmental deterioration much faster than even
natural disasters.
Soils, water and biodiversity are therefore reducing natural’ resources now due to interference with evolutionary forces and over
utilization.
We are rushing ahead with utilization as though today
counts more than tomorrow. The human intelligence and power of
reasoning which apparently distinguishes it from other species is
being used more for destruction than conservation of natural
endowments.
Soils, especially topsails are, along with clean air and water, life
support systems which ensure the food chain is intact and food
security is assured. Yet our agricultural, pastoral, forestry,
irrigation and industrial practices are such that precious topsoil is
being washed away year after year and there is no renewal of either
the soil or the nutrients that go with it to sustain our food chain
over a long period. Use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers for
short-term gains, over irrigation and changes in land use like
deforestation, over urbanization and overgrazing are altering the
chemical composition and texture of soils and laying waste productive
land like never before.
Our waters are victims too of similar phenomena. Both quality and
quantity of water are in grave danger. We have reached a stage where
waters in our rivers, lakes, ponds and even under the ground are no
longer fit for drinking or even bathing in many places. Over use of
water for irrigation, interference with natural water courses and
industrialization has resulted in disputes between even States within
our country itself! Things have come to such a pass that even the
abundant sea waters are now being polluted by discharge of sewerage,
industrial effluents and oil spills which endanger marine biological
resources on which we could have depended when our terrestrial
resources are depleted.
Flora and fauna of all descriptions which are part of the rich
biological diversity are disappearing at a faster rate than when
natural phenomena overtook them.
In India we have lost the cheetah and
the pink headed duck in the last century, to mention two species which
were more visible. Many other organisms both above and below ground
must have vanished even before being documented. Many domesticated
species of animals and crops too are now victims of the greed for more
production and breeds which served us well for centuries are now on
the verge of extinction.
We are compelled to see many of our animals
and plants only in zoological parks, botanical gardens or herbariums
Many species are now in the threatened or vulnerable category and we
are hard put to conserve even our apex species like the tiger and the
elephant
Why have we reached this stage in our existence where our own future,
leave aside that of future generations is put at such risk? It is easy
to ascribe this as being due to overpopulation or the inevitability of
economic growth where some sacrifices are inevitable. But the more
deep causes are cultural in nature.
The values of conservation and
proximity to Nature which prevailed for centuries and even permeated
religious and other beliefs, particularly in countries like India are
facing erosion. The dominance of the human species, ignoring the
equity among, if not equality of, all living things and organisms has
reached a point where it is endangering its own survival. Unlike our
ancient cultures we see now natural resources as those to be
subjugated, used and even overused in the name of better management!
The surprising aspect of these developments is the utter disregard of
the interests of our own future generations who will find that non
renewable natural resources have been exhausted and renewable
resources have been harvested to the point of no return.
These trends do not reflect the close link between soils, water,
biodiversity and human cultures which did not look at them as distinct
entities to be manipulated at will but as a continuum with strong
inter linkages.
We in this country have had such a culture and
understanding of Nature for centuries and even now, mercifully, in
most of our rural areas and in select urban pockets we have wise
people arid 'Communities which cherish and even worship these
linkages.
They have a clear understanding of the distinction between
need and greed and the intra and intergenerational equities which are
fostered by a spirit of give and take, compassion and mutual love and
support.
It
is no surprise that most of the saints, savants, religious and even
temporal heads recognized these linkages not only in the world but
especially in India. We had the Vedas which sought benediction in
natural phenomena as when they said vanaspatheye shanthih. In the
Bhagwad Gita, the lord says that among the trees He was the aswattah.
The two religions which originated here just before the birth of Jesus
Christ, Buddhism and Jainism gave central place to compassion, karuna.
jeeva karunya or compassion to all living creatures became a powerful
tool of thought and action, so much so that two thousand years later,
it became part of the Constitution of India which makes it the
fundamental duty of India's citizens to "have compassion for all
living creatures", We had kings like Sibi and Paari who were part of
this culture.
Sibi carved out his own flesh to save a dove trom the
hunter who insited on his pound of flesh. Paari left his golden
chariot on the side of the road to support a jasmine creeper which was
drooping under its own weight Then we had Emperor Ashoka who decreed
tne creation of wildlife sanctuaries and even had a hospital for
elephants! Our common people recognised the pools of water and
biodiversity in many places and by attributing divinity to them,
preserved them as devarakadu or "Sacred Groves".
Strangely, centuries later we saw the British naturalist and shikari
Mr Jim Corbett recognising the distinction th_ animal kingdom observed
between greed and need.
He was averse to the practice of attracting
tigers with a goat as bait When he was prevailed upon by a hunter
friend to witness from a machan such a bait for the tiger, the tiger
astonished his friend by smelling the goat and walking away! Jim
Corbett was not surprised and told his friend the tiger must have
killed for food just before that and so had no interest in the goat!
The tiger killed only when it had a need and not out of greed. Can we
say the same thing about many of the lavish and ostentatious things we
do these days?
The cultural values that helped conserve our natural resources did not
treat them as separate entities but sawall of them as a whole not
distinct from the parts-the concept of poornam and simple living
inherent in some of our texts and philosophy.
The simple life, dharmic
path and philanthropy practiced by the Jagadguru Shivaratri Swamigalu
Order are in the same genre. But the prevalence and power of the
existentialist thought as well as the two dimensional reductionist
approach of Western Science, which we have copied without demur, have
led us away trom these values.
It
is not as though we can have only one path of development that is
ruinous to our natural resources. We can practice many things which
contribute to sustainable development like using more of biological
control of pests and diseases, finding more biodegradable substances
for uses which have become part of the modern cultures, growing more
of nutrition rich and less water intensive crops that will help
minimse conflicts, incorporating cleaner technologies that do not
generate waste at all and do not pollute our air and waters, reusing
and recyc1 ing- the list of things that the human intellect can do to
conserve natural resources is long but practical and achievable. But
what more is required is a cultural attitiude where the spirit governs
us as much as matter. Contentment and being able to make do with less,
altruistic practices that avoid driving the weak up the wall, respect
and compassion for all living creatures (which should include plants,
shrubs and trees) -these and more that our saints and scriptures have
imbibed in us should drive us rather than greed and an attitude of the
Devil'taking the hindmost.
The thought for the morrow and the lives we
shall ourselves create for living in it should ever be at the back of
our mind as we use our soils, water and biodiversity.
I
had an interesting experience with communities living around Nagarhole
National park. Many in the group of villagers were incensed about not
being allowed to cut the grass, gather small fuel or take up small
water harvesting structures. When they were asked whether they were
against the steps taken to conserve wildlife they said no, but wanted
that the Park should not inhibit their own growth in terms of food,
income and jobs. When they were asked if someone else also ought to be
heard in this connection, they were a bit confused as who it could be.
When I asked if we should not hear also the animals, trees and grasses
what they thought of all this, the people became silent. It is quite
possible they thought I was being eccentric but I give them the
benefit of doubt and recognise their cultural milieu where other
living beings were also having divine sanction. If they were not like
that surely they would have risen in protest. But it is not possible
to have the same reaction from those for whom making a quick rupee or
believe "Development is all".
I have tried to reason with many of our
engineers, contractors, industrialists, farmers and even policymakers
and found that they paid only lip-homage to our cultural traditions
and Conservation. Our future 'witl be secure only when they imbibe the
values I quoted from ou Vedas and philosophies and from the following
two quotations.
The first is from a Nobel Peace Lauraeate Ms Rigoberta
Menchu who is from Guatemela and of Mayan descent. It reads.
"The Mayas, our grandparents, always said ,every human being occupies
a small piece of time, time itself is much longer, and because of this
they always said that we must care for this earth while we are on it
because it will be part of our children, of our granDchildren.
They
know that life is short, that it can end so soon, and if that one gets
lost on the way, others will come to take their place"
The second one is from a Cree
Indian saying in USA: "It is only when the last tree has been cut When
the last fish has been caught,
When the last river has been poisoned,
That you
will realise that you cannot eat money". Amen. |
| Top |
|